..............................English version..........................
I have a lot of time to spend on my computer in this period, because the weather is really bad and cold in Guangzhou. So, I have a lot of time to think about my life....
I saw a video on internet which talked about the "procrastination" (the link: http://www.koreus.com/video/procrastination.html). It was the first time I heard that word. I checked that on internet and the meaning is something like that: You have something big to do, but it s really BIG and you prefer to make so many things rather than to do this one. In this way, you can:
-Take a tea
-check your mails
-clean your office or your house
-others things like that....
But, surely not to do what you had to do. And usually, you feel some culpability to escape your task.
And I realised that I did this in two things in my life:
The first one is go game (chinese game) wich I play since two years. I played regularly for more than one year and after that, I played only sometimes or to teach this wonderful game to many people. And each time I wanted to play, but something inside me made me feeling bad about that.
And now, I know why: procrastination! Go game is a really difficult game and in a life, you can t go at the end of the game, you can t become the master of the game, just you will be better, not the best, just better...and to become that, in my level, you need to work, not enjoy, work; learn some shapes of professionnal players, study games of these players, play with stronger players for loosing, for learning about your loss.... All these things are not really fun, and the way to reach the goal (if you can reach the goal...) is so far away....too far away in fact...for me....so I dismissed and didn t really play anymore, but I promise you that I have the need to play this game all the time... O_o
The second one is: the meditation.
For my new english readers, I participated to a meditation course in Hong Kong. I stayed 10 days in this course, without speaking, reading, smoking; just meditating for 10 days, 10 hours per day.
It was really interesting, but, at the end of the course, they explained you the whole technic and I was really desperate to understand that I just "softly touched" the whole technic and that, after more than 90hours of meditations. It will need so many hours of hard work to get a good result. Too much hours for me....so, even if I was really convinced by the goodness of this technic, I wasn t able to meditate every day (like I had to do to keep what I learned). I just dismissed in front of the hardness of the task....
Then, now, I know these behaviors were proscrination. I know that I dismissed in front of the hardness of the task, even if I wanted to spend some time in that. And I changed my mind about that...I started to play go and to do my meditations...I know just I will do that in my rythme, slowly, when I want and even if my progress will be slow, it s ok...it will be slow and what???
And now, you re asking yourself why I tell you that...??? Just because everybody do that and I believe that YOU are doing that, now...so, have a look to this good article I fished on internet, it could be interesting. (at the end of this page, after french version... ;)
............................Version francaise...........................
En ce moment, j ai vraiment tout le temps du monde à passer devant mon pc parce que la temps à Canton est vraiment pourri: froid et pluvieux. L humidité se glisse dans vos vetements et malgré les 6/8 degrés, ca vous glace jusqu aux os.
Du coup, comme je passe vraiment plein de temps sur internet, et plein de temps a reflechir sur ma vie (comme souvent faut dire...), je me suis rendu compte d un trucs facheux: je fais de la procrastination! Je vous donne un lien d une petite video qui vous explique tres bien ce que c est: http://www.koreus.com/video/procrastination.html
Pour la petite histoire la procrastination, c est avoir un tres gros trucs a faire, mais c est tellement gros que du coup on a peur de commencer, alors on fait plein d autres trucs importants ou non pour reporter le moment ou on va s atteler à la grosse tache.
Pour vous donner un exemple de procrastination, vous pouvez, pour reculer le moment crucial:
-preparer un thé
-faire le ménage chez vous ou au bureau
-verifier vos mails
-et toutes choses qui vont vous faire reculer ce moment.
Et la chose vraiment désagréable de la procrastination, c est que vous culpabilisez de ne pas faire ce que vous avez a faire....:llmmmmmmmà
Et je me suis rendu compte que je faisais ca pour deux choses: le jeu de go et la méditation.
Pour le jeu de go, c est plutot simple a comprendre. J ai joué tres serieusement pendant un peu plus de un an et tout a coup j ai laché l affaire. Juste un peu d enseignement des bases pour de nouveaux joueurs ou ptet juste une ptite partie ou deux histoire de pas perdre la main...mais plus vraiment "jouer"....
Le go en fait c est infini... vous jouez, vous progressez, c est bien, mais au bout d un moment, l intuition ne suffit plus a vous faire progresser. A un moment, il vous faut travailler: apprendre des formes de pierres par coeur, etudier des parties de maitre, jouer contre de tres forts joueur et perdre, apprendre des parties que vous avez perdu....bref, ce qui etait plaisir devient travail...et un travail qui n a pas de fin puisqu au go vous n etes jamais bon; au go vous pouvez jouer toute votre vie, vous n en verrez jamais le bout....
Et voila pourquoi j ai abandonné, j ai abandonné devant l ampleur de la tache...
Pour la méditation, c est un peu pareil. Apres avoir passé 10 jours a travailler ardemment, ils nous ont devoilé la technique finale et je me suis rendu compte de l ampleur de la tache...je n avais en 90 heures de méditation, qu effleuré la technique et je me suis rendu compte aussi que ce n était pas en 2 petites heures par jour que j allais arriver a faire des progres. Peut etre tout juste conserver mes acquis, mais progresser....pour ca il me faudrait travailler 4 heures par jour au minimum pour conserver mes acquis et progresser un tout petit peu ....vraiment infini comme job....trop infini pour moi qui aime aller au bout des choses.....
Et voila....et je réalise enfin qu il y a un mot a mettre la dessus: procrastination....
La peur de pas pouvoir aller au bout, la peur d une tache trop enorme pour envisager de s y consacrer, la culpabilité de ne pas jouer ou de ne pas méditer alors que je voudrais.....Evident tout ca apres coup....
Et c est utile d en prendre conscience, tres utile meme parce que je me suis remis au go, l esprit plus leger, je me suis remis à la méditation, mais pas a fond cette fois ci comme d habitude, je prends mon temps, j essaye d y consacrer un peu de temps tous les jours et seulement quand j en ai l envie, pour ne pas voir ca comme une tache astreignante.....Un gros progrés à mon idée....
Et la vous vous demandez pourquoi je vous parle de ca...??? Ben parce que je suis sur que c est ce que vous faites dans votre vie de tous les jours, un peu comme moi, et je me suis dit que si ca m a servi à moi d en prendre conscience, ben ca vous servira sans doute aussi. =)
Le texte en anglais ci dessous parle de la procrastination de maniere tres interessante. Pour les anglophones, je vous laisse le découvrir et pour les autres, je vous invite a taper "procrastination" sur google et à regarder aussi bien la définition de la chose que les moyens de s en débarasser....(attention c est le meme mot en anglais et en francais, n oubliez pas de cocher "site francophones seulement" Bye!
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
December 2005
The most impressive people I know are all terrible procrastinators.
So could it be that procrastination isn't always bad?
Most people who write about procrastination write about how to cure
it. But this is, strictly speaking, impossible. There are an
infinite number of things you could be doing. No matter what you
work on, you're not working on everything else. So the question
is not how to avoid procrastination, but how to procrastinate well.
There are three variants of procrastination, depending on what you
do instead of working on something: you could work on (a) nothing,
(b) something less important, or (c) something more important. That
last type, I'd argue, is good procrastination.
That's the "absent-minded professor," who forgets to shave, or eat,
or even perhaps look where he's going while he's thinking about
some interesting question. His mind is absent from the everyday
world because it's hard at work in another.
That's the sense in which the most impressive people I know are all
procrastinators. They're type-C procrastinators: they put off
working on small stuff to work on big stuff.
What's "small stuff?" Roughly, work that has zero chance of being
mentioned in your obituary. It's hard to say at the time what will
turn out to be your best work (will it be your magnum opus on
Sumerian temple architecture, or the detective thriller you wrote
under a pseudonym?), but there's a whole class of tasks you can
safely rule out: shaving, doing your laundry, cleaning the house,
writing thank-you notes—anything that might be called an errand.
Good procrastination is avoiding errands to do real work.
Good in a sense, at least. The people who want you to do the errands
won't think it's good. But you probably have to annoy them if you
want to get anything done. The mildest seeming people, if they
want to do real work, all have a certain degree of ruthlessness
when it comes to avoiding errands.
Some errands, like replying to letters, go away if you
ignore them (perhaps taking friends with them). Others, like mowing
the lawn, or filing tax returns, only get worse if you put them
off. In principle it shouldn't work to put off the second kind of
errand. You're going to have to do whatever it is eventually. Why
not (as past-due notices are always saying) do it now?
The reason it pays to put off even those errands is that real work
needs two things errands don't: big chunks of time, and the
right mood. If you get inspired by some project, it can be a net
win to blow off everything you were supposed to do for the next few
days to work on it. Yes, those errands may cost you more time when
you finally get around to them. But if you get a lot done during
those few days, you will be net more productive.
In fact, it may not be a difference in degree, but a difference in
kind. There may be types of work that can only be done in long,
uninterrupted stretches, when inspiration hits, rather than dutifully
in scheduled little slices. Empirically it seems to be so. When
I think of the people I know who've done great things, I don't
imagine them dutifully crossing items off to-do lists. I imagine
them sneaking off to work on some new idea.
Conversely, forcing someone to perform errands synchronously is
bound to limit their productivity. The cost of an interruption is
not just the time it takes, but that it breaks the time on either
side in half. You probably only have to interrupt someone a couple
times a day before they're unable to work on hard problems at all.
I've wondered a lot about why
startups are most productive at the
very beginning, when they're just a couple guys in an apartment.
The main reason may be that there's no one to interrupt them yet.
In theory it's good when the founders finally get enough money to
hire people to do some of the work for them. But it may be better
to be overworked than interrupted. Once you dilute a startup with
ordinary office workers—with type-B procrastinators—the whole
company starts to resonate at their frequency. They're interrupt-driven,
and soon you are too.
Errands are so effective at killing great projects that a lot of
people use them for that purpose. Someone who has decided to write
a novel, for example, will suddenly find that the house needs
cleaning. People who fail to write novels don't do it by sitting
in front of a blank page for days without writing anything. They
do it by feeding the cat, going out to buy something they need for
their apartment, meeting a friend for coffee, checking email. "I
don't have time to work," they say. And they don't; they've made
sure of that.
(There's also a variant where one has no place to work. The cure
is to visit the places where famous people worked, and see how
unsuitable they were.)
I've used both these excuses at one time or another. I've learned
a lot of tricks for making myself work over the last 20 years, but
even now I don't win consistently. Some days I get real work done.
Other days are eaten up by errands. And I know it's usually my
fault: I let errands eat up the day, to avoid
facing some hard problem.
The most dangerous form of procrastination is unacknowledged type-B
procrastination, because it doesn't feel like procrastination.
You're "getting things done." Just the wrong things.
Any advice about procrastination that concentrates on crossing
things off your to-do list is not only incomplete, but positively
misleading, if it doesn't consider the possibility that the to-do
list is itself a form of type-B procrastination. In fact, possibility
is too weak a word. Nearly everyone's is. Unless you're working
on the biggest things you could be working on, you're type-B
procrastinating, no matter how much you're getting done.
In his famous essay You and Your Research
(which I recommend to
anyone ambitious, no matter what they're working on), Richard Hamming
suggests that you ask yourself three questions:
- What are the most important problems in your field?
- Are you working on one of them?
- Why not?
Hamming was at Bell Labs when he started asking such questions. In
principle anyone there ought to have been able to work on the most
important problems in their field. Perhaps not everyone can make
an equally dramatic mark on the world; I don't know; but whatever
your capacities, there are projects that stretch them. So Hamming's
exercise can be generalized to:
What's the best thing you could be working on, and why aren't
you?
Most people will shy away from this question. I shy away from it
myself; I see it there on the page and quickly move on to the next
sentence. Hamming used to go around actually asking people this,
and it didn't make him popular. But it's a question anyone ambitious
should face.
The trouble is, you may end up hooking a very big fish with this
bait. To do good work, you need to do more than find good projects.
Once you've found them, you have to get yourself to work on them,
and that can be hard. The bigger the problem, the harder it is to
get yourself to work on it.
Of course, the main reason people find it difficult to work on a
particular problem is that they don't
enjoy it. When you're young,
especially, you often find yourself working on stuff you don't
really like-- because it seems impressive, for example, or because
you've been assigned to work on it. Most grad students are stuck
working on big problems they don't really like, and grad school is
thus synonymous with procrastination.
But even when you like what you're working on, it's easier to get
yourself to work on small problems than big ones. Why? Why is it
so hard to work on big problems? One reason is that you may not
get any reward in the forseeable future. If you work on something
you can finish in a day or two, you can expect to have a nice feeling
of accomplishment fairly soon. If the reward is indefinitely far
in the future, it seems less real.
Another reason people don't work on big projects is, ironically,
fear of wasting time. What if they fail? Then all the time they
spent on it will be wasted. (In fact it probably won't be, because
work on hard projects almost always leads somewhere.)
But the trouble with big problems can't be just that they promise
no immediate reward and might cause you to waste a lot of time. If
that were all, they'd be no worse than going to visit your in-laws.
There's more to it than that. Big problems are terrifying.
There's an almost physical pain in facing them. It's like having
a vacuum cleaner hooked up to your imagination. All your initial
ideas get sucked out immediately, and you don't have any more, and
yet the vacuum cleaner is still sucking.
You can't look a big problem too directly in the eye. You have to
approach it somewhat obliquely. But you have to adjust the angle
just right: you have to be facing the big problem directly enough
that you catch some of the excitement radiating from it, but not
so much that it paralyzes you. You can tighten the angle once you
get going, just as a sailboat can sail closer to the wind once it
gets underway.
If you want to work on big things, you seem to have to trick yourself
into doing it. You have to work on small things that could grow
into big things, or work on successively larger things, or split
the moral load with collaborators. It's not a sign of weakness to
depend on such tricks. The very best work has been done this way.
When I talk to people who've managed to make themselves work on big
things, I find that all blow off errands, and all feel guilty about
it. I don't think they should feel guilty. There's more to do
than anyone could. So someone doing the best work they can is
inevitably going to leave a lot of errands undone. It seems a
mistake to feel bad about that.
I think the way to "solve" the problem of procrastination is to let
delight pull you instead of making a to-do list push you. Work on
an ambitious project you really enjoy, and sail as close to the
wind as you can, and you'll leave the right things undone.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,