Aesthetic existence unconditionally linked with eco-centricism, chronic reason is simple, landscape is necessary for photography, and ideally his /her sensitivity passes through imageries in nervous system. Being an artist; thoughts imbibed with visuals, hence such intuitional stitching work in mind is philosophically evocating while it reproduce literally or as visual medium. Experiences are not only events for visualizing community, but also imbued with its actual ecological epigraph; it underlines creative brain is under the volcano of “To Do”. Uncertainty may continue as monologue of every disturbed art catalysts, unintentionally concerned mind situation facilitates epistemological consciousness in their output. Few kind of creative waves and threads are non verbal; it seems to be uncommunicative in peripherally. Doing metaphorical initiative is kind of spiritual fervor, in the sense of Cinematography, painting, installation etc. These communes probably in search of revelations; it will explode when they got a chance to reveal their cramping potential. Needless to say in a material view creative commune normally won’t accept stereotypical outlook of existentialism, verbally rebels swim towards perpetrated river. Even an idea or sentence magnificently plant the seeds of visualization capability of creative communes while people usually interact, the result is they might have blocked with countless doubts and frustrations. Even the nature of this inquiry is paradoxical understanding of trembling chasms of minds and its extremity of curiousness; we wonder why Hemingway, Christof Kislovoski, Andre Tharkovosky, Akira Kurasoa, Roger Deakins, Alex Thomson and Gilbert Taylor all blew their brains out. Why the same person can light up a stage for millions, and then find themselves at a loss for words in a face to face conversation. Precisely their arrogance might be addressed as segregation of aesthetical melancholy; To be honest, their deeds need have meditative approach, creative communes itself have genuinity on making of craft, particularly cinematography, painting, conceiving requires skeptical intuitivism, knowing these biological myth would not taken on confrontation of psychiatrist, Perhaps kind of radical self discovery process always happening inside, Being a narcissistic is usual in the case of creative intellectual until “ego” deserves as inner mentor. Such a way justifications cross all the limits. Strangely theories, assumptions would be in “clash” because argumentative values deconstructed when we discuss with these iconic persons when some master’s films viewers aren’t convinced conscience but it might have been confused their pre -constructed perception. Easy to say most of the cinematic threads emerged with the help of isolated ecological support, needless to allusionize, Ingmar Bergman stayed in an isolated island, ‘above 21 years in solitude’. Historically creative communes thinking process have nomadic miniature on the basis of poetic unsatisfaction on their passionate works. Imageries are inseparable from their thinking process, although crowed usually feel these vibrant minds are “Moving republic”. Hope their burns make difference. Most importantly, creative communes thinking fuel comes from deep wilderness, because their first visual culture professor might be “Nature” in all aspects. Hence I can’t stop travelling, tomorrow I moving for long ride by bike, hope the wind may revolutionize the journey!!!
